A Rectification of a technique of Esoteric practice?

[David_Mastrogiovanni]

I apologize...I may have gone off half cocked...the point of it all, is that by what I've realized from the book on the Sabian system by Rudhyar is that there is apparently a 'Evolutionary' cycle that begins at Virgo 30* and completes at Libra 01* in the opposite order of procession from what is known as Traditional Astrology. It will have to be studied throughly and it may take years...a lifetime...it may happen over night too...I can't say. But I do know that this study is new to me and I'm not qualified to make a judgement...at least not at this time.

...and...it appears that all formulae for Arabic Parts/Lots that call for a reversal of the equations are to be applied to this system and not those those systems that use Aries 1* as the orientation point.* As the Parts of Fortune and of Spirit/Soul trade places when switching to this "Evolutionary' cycle that has been designated by Rudhyar.
*I am determining this through the use of the renowned clairvoyant, Clarisse Conner, who has proven herself repeatedly without failure on all such questions pertaining to Astrology both in technique and rectification to this date. Specifically I asked her whether the formula should be switched to the 'Night' one depending upon hour of birth to which she said no, that the 'Day' formula was the only one to use in regards to the Part of Fortune. [And as I was only aware of the 'Involutionary' system then her reply would only concern that.]
I apologize to the members and Mr. Erlewine for making a bit of a mess here with this particular sub-forum and thread.
Thank you, David.

[David_Mastrogiovanni]

...as I am not qualified to really be making any statements of what is proper technique as pertaining to "Esoteric Astrology", I'm offering this link to another web-sites' astrological forum where-in the ongoing discussion and debate of what my assumptions may or may not conclude and what added insights other Astrologers are contributing is currently happening.
I trust this is permissible by Michaels' criteria...as it certainly seems like the only proper and respectful thing to do.
http://www.astrologyweekly.com/forum/sh ... hp?t=30850

[David_Mastrogiovanni]

This has lead to thought concerning Rx planets....

[David_Mastrogiovanni]

see thread in support of this theory viewtopic.php?f=18&t=257

[David_Mastrogiovanni]

see previous

[David_Mastrogiovanni]

see previous

[David_Mastrogiovanni]

a new development...from a post at astrologyweekly.com
________________________________________________________________

[from astrologyweekly.com]
...very interesting. as the author at the link above then makes mention of the symbolism designating most conspicuously a point directly between Capricorn and Aquarius that has to do with the Egyptian mythological account of creation.
The author then provides a link to a Capricorn Star chart
http://www.mazzaroth.com/InsertTwo/C...t.htm#Denderah
and makes mention of the fact that many scholars of the Denderah Zodiac claim that they understand it states that the Zodiac begins at Virgo.
Both of these statements support two of my own findings that I have written about. One account is my thread on the mutual validation of the Sabian Symbols and the Kabbalistic interpretation of the Book of Habakkuk in the Torah [Old Testament] as written about by Dr. [Rabbi] Joel Dobin in his book "Kabbalistic Astrology."
which can be read here:
viewtopic.php?f=18&t=75

And what I recently discovered and have given evidence of and wrote about in my thread I titled "A Rectification of a Technique of Esoteric Practice?",
which can be read here:
viewtopic.php?f=59&t=245
which in turn explains, supports and proves the theories of Dane Rudhyar as to true understanding of the beginning of the Zodiac being the sign Virgo [at the 30th degree and proceeding in the opposite direction [also identified as the 'Evolutionary Path or Procession"] from that as utilized presently. [which is identified as the "Involutionary Path or Procession.]
__________________