Hi everyone,
There is a new book on Hermes:
van Bladel: 'The Arabic Hermes', 2009, Oxford.
This is a PhD dissertation from Harvard (if I remember right).
This book is a sign of what is coming fast our way!
An example of good science and how a good science is made.
van Bladel annihilates the wrong conceptions of Pingree and restores the legend of the three Hermeses- the pre-diluvial, the Babylonian and the Egyptian.
Casaubon, Walter Scott and then Pingree created a mess around Hermes, robbing him of his antiquity first (Casaubon) and then falsely interpreting his doctrine (Scott) and then even denying his existence (Pingree).
[If someone really wants to use a good translation of Corpus Hermeticum, this is Festugiere (in French).]
Unfortunately, there is no Astrology in van Bladel, but this is not the topic of his book.
Ultimately, the pre-diluvial Hermes should be no-one, but En Meduranki- the true prophet of God given the true knowledge of Astrology in a Revelation somewhere around 5,500 BC or earlier.
More on this will be in my own research on the Babylonian Astrolabe soon to be published in the 'Proceedings of the Melammu VI symposium' [expected in the end of 2010 or early 2011 ( look at http://www.aakkl.helsinki.fi/melammu/sy ... r6info.php ) ]
The main topic is the dating of the Babylonian Astrolabe, but one of the consequences of the research is exactly the conclusion:
Hermes Trismegistus = En Meduranki.
This should be the initial point for the next stage of the research to reconstruct the original teachings of EnMeduranki {since now we have a thread we can follow straight to the begin of mythological time}.
(The debate started already with an article [against my thesis] by the German scholar, famous with publications in Bab. Astronomy, Dr. Koch Johannes in N.A.B.U. 2010.2 pages 53-56. My answer to Koch is expected in NABU 2010.4) { N.A.B.U.= Nouvelles Assyriologiques Breves et Utilitaires }
yours rumen
